Kimberley R. Cousins
Department of Chemistry
California State University
San Bernardino CA
kcousins@csusb.edu
Abstract:
This paper describes
the evolution of computing in the chemistry department at a racially diverse
comprehensive university, serving a large number of transfer and commuter
students. Dissatisfaction with available computing facilities led a core
group of faculty in the department to seek funding for establishing a networked
departmental computing lab. In the process a rational plan for incorporating
computing for mathematical and molecular modeling and communication throughout
the curriculum was developed and implemented. By developing materials and
providing formal and informal training, we enabled the less technically
sophisticated faculty and adjunct instructors to use computing in their
teaching. Computer applications are now embedded throughout the laboratory
curriculum, including in-service courses such as "Chemistry in the Classroom",
which targets pre-K-6 teachers. The computer lab is in high demand, and
the department is committed to maintaining and upgrading the facility.
Opening remarks:
Most of you are using computers in the chemistry curriculum,
and many are reporting their use. For example, a Google search run August
4, 2004 using the words "computing in the chemistry curriculum" scored
about 23,000 hits (albeit many are far a field from the searcher's intent).
More precisely, a search of the Journal of Chemical Education Online
index
[1] on the same day using the keyword "computer" found 1203 records.
You may then be wondering what is unique about this paper, and whether
you should read it. In fact, there few published studies
[2] of the scope of this conference, computing across the curriculum.
This paper describes the unique evolution of computing in chemistry at
CSUSB.
"Well-prepared students should emerge from a program
in chemistry with . . . experience with computers, including an ability
to use word processors, spreadsheets, numerical and nonnumerical algorithms,
simulations and computation, data acquisition, and databases for information
handling and retrieval . . ." ACT-CPT[3]
The American Chemical Society
(ACS) Committee on Professional Training has developed guidelines and procedures
for an ACS approved program.[3]
In addition to the competencies outlined in the quote above, the document
discusses the use of online databases for searching the chemical literature,
and recommends using computer workstations for computational chemistry
and molecular modeling. Zielisnki and Swift
[4] name a number of competencies we should expect of chemistry graduates,
such as word processing (including creating chemical structures and equations),
scientific graphing, mathematical modeling and visualization, computer-instrument
interfacing, and accessing materials from the WWW.
Chartered in 1960, the
California
State University, San Bernardino (CSUSB) is the sole public, comprehensive,
regional university in the Riverside and San Bernardino counties of Southern
California. As a medium sized campus of the 23-campus California
State University system, the University offers more than 50 traditional
baccalaureate and masters degree programs, with an emphasis on preparing
K-12 teachers. The University serves almost 17,000 students from a service
area extending over 29,000 square miles from the Arizona border to the
Los Angeles county line. In the last decade, the area population has increased
over 60 percent to a total of three million residents, where no racial
or ethnic group is a majority. Our campus is designated a Hispanic Serving
Institution.
.
The Department
of Chemistry at CSUSB (recently renamed The Department
of Chemistry and Biochemistry) is
comprised of twelve permanent faculty members and three full time support
staff. Students enroll in one of four major tracks, with emphases in either
chemistry or biochemistry at the BA and BS levels. The BS-ACS degree is
certified by the American Chemical Society. The department offers a rigorous
curriculum involving both teaching and research. In 1997 the computing
facilities in our department were abysmal, greatly limiting what could
be accomplished in our courses. A handful of faculty hand-me-down computers
were located in the corners of labs, a closet, and an empty office with
a patchwork of software for student use. Many were not connected to a network
or to the Internet. Other computing facilities on campus were not suitable,
as they provided limited access, an inability to load chemistry-specific
applications, and were located remote from our "wet" laboratories and faculty
offices. Our departmental Assessment Plan,
[5] developed in the mid-1990's, included as a goal ". . . to provide
students with the opportunities to practice effective scientific computer,
written and oral communications skills". We were not then meeting this
goal, particularly in the area of computing.
To address the growing
gulf between our reality and our ideal for student computing, four chemistry
faculty representing a breadth of sub-disciplines established a computer
committee (See Table 1). We
decided to seek outside funding in order to leverage local resources and
space.
The computer committee
has been instrumental in all aspects of this project. The four original
members worked together to create a vision for computing in the department.
This included addressing what we, and others,3,4 believed to
be core competencies, defining which courses in the curriculum would be
used to introduce and build upon computer skills, and devising a plan for
implementation and evaluation of learning. Much of this planning was accomplished
while preparing a proposal for the NSF-ILI program in 1997, titled A
Unified Plan for Mathematical and Molecular Modeling Data Analysis and
Chemical Communication in the Laboratory Curriculum.
[6] After funding was awarded,
the committee worked to locate a room and oversee physical modifications
and furnishings, purchase hardware and software, set up the computers and
the network, and develop and implement the proposed curricular changes.
The committee continues to meet regularly, in order to address ongoing
laboratory issues, monitor computer use in the curriculum, and plan for
the future.
All workstations are equipped with the software listed
in
black in Table 2
Table 1: Faculty on the Chemistry Department
Computer Committee
The computer laboratory
Table 2: Software applications available in chemistry computer laboratory
|
Application
|
Use in Courses
|
Vendor/Source
|
|
|
Microsoft Word
|
Preparing laboratory reports; course, seminar and
research papers
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
Microsoft Excel
|
Spreadsheet/graphing of laboratory data; simple
mathematical modeling
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
Microsoft PowerPoint
|
Preparing presentations for senior seminar, research
presentations and posters
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
Microsoft QuickBasic
|
BASIC programming
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
Kaleidagraph
|
Scientific graphing of laboratory data
|
||
|
PCSpartan Pro
|
Molecular mechanics, quantum mechanics calculations;
molecule visualization
|
||
|
Labworks
|
Work with data from LabWorks probes; build methods
|
No longer available (formerly Bartlett and Jones)
|
|
|
CS ChemDraw Ltd
|
Chemical structure drawing
|
||
|
Internet Explorer/Netscape Navigator
|
Internet Browsers
|
Microsoft and Netscape
|
|
|
Browser plug-ins:
Java, Marvinsketch,
Chime, Quicktime, Shockwave, Flash, RealPlayer, Acrobat Reader
|
To view sometimes dynamic and interactive web content
|
Various
|
|
|
Axum
|
High end scientific graphing
|
||
|
Macromodel
|
Molecular mechanics and
dynamics
|
||
|
Qsite
|
Substrate binding studies
|
||
|
GaussianW
|
Computational chemistry
package
|
||
|
GAMESS-US
|
Computational chemistry
package
|
||
|
Jaguar
|
Computational chemistry
package
|
||
|
MOLEKEL
|
Visualization of computational
results
|
||
|
ShelX
|
Crystallographic data
analysis
|
||
|
ChemOffice Ultra
|
High end chemical drawing;
3-D modeling and analysis; chemical database building
|
||
|
GRAMS
|
Analysis of spectroscopic
data
|
||
|
SPSS
|
Statistical analysis
package
|
||
Given the limited size of the available room, and
our desire to have students working in pairs in instructional laboratories,
we chose a fourteen-workstation configuration in the main lab. This allows
us to bring an entire section of a traditional laboratory course (enrollment
up to 24 students) into the computer laboratory for guided instruction.
A white board has been essential for instructional use, as well as for
communicating with computer users, and a calendar is posted on the wall
to avoid conflicts between scheduled classes. The satellite lab has proven
useful for accommodating individual students during formal instructional
sessions in the main computer lab, and for providing additional workstations
during the busiest portions of the quarter. In addition, the satellite
lab is on the same floor as the physical chemistry wet lab, enabling the
instructor to easily cycle between the computer and wet laboratory.
A networked system, while harder to set up and maintain,
maximized our computing resources. Thus we invested in a Windows NT (updated
to Windows 2000 Professional) server with large redundant hard drives,
and backup capabilities. Each workstation requires password access. This
allows control and monitoring of student activity in the lab and on the
Internet, while providing each student with central storage space, so that
their preferences and files appeared the same regardless of the workstation
used. Having a network also enabled us to purchase fewer copies of some
specialty software (PCSpartan Pro, ChemDraw, MathCAD). As long as the maximum
the number of licenses is not exceeded, these programs can be accessed
from any Windows computer in the lab, or in the department. The server
vendor helped us set up the network initially, and a series of student
assistants (with periodic technical help from campus staff and faculty)
have maintained and upgraded the network. We have found it necessary to
purchase third party server software to assist maintaining our accounts
and computers (see Table 3). Even with this additional software,
maintaining, entering, and deleting of lab accounts, occasional "reimaging"
(clearing off and reinstalling all software from an image) of machines,
and dealing with technical problems, including maintaining antivirus and
systems security updates is a labor intensive process. Our department invests
more money annually in our computer laboratory student assistant than in
the multiple students who prepare chemicals and solutions for our "wet"
laboratories (about 120 lab sections per year).
Table 3: Auxiliary Server Applications
|
Product Name
|
Product Version
|
What it does
|
Vendor website
|
|
Symantec GhostCast Server
|
7.5.0.335
|
Creates workstation "image" that is stored on the
server then loaded onto each reformatted workstation
|
|
|
PrintManager Plus
|
5.0.0.32
|
Allows administrator to set printing limits (and
monitor printing) for each account
|
|
|
UserManagmeNT
|
5.4, Build 1853
|
Create, move, delete, audit accounts easily
|
|
|
SpaceGuard SRM
|
5.2, Build 1053
|
Monitor and enforce space quotas for accounts
|
|
|
Veritas Backup Exec
|
8.50
|
Automatic backup of server to tape
|
Table 4: Student use of computer applications in the Chemistry Curriculum
|
Course/Program
|
Kaleidagraph
(graphing)
|
MS
Word
|
MS
Excel
|
Computer-
Interfaced
instruments
|
PCSpartan
Pro (molecular modeling)
|
ChemDraw
Ltd.
|
Online
literature searching
|
Browser
/Chime |
LabWorks
Stations
|
MS
Basic
|
MS
PowerPoint
|
Specialty
applications
|
|
Chem.
215/216 (General Chem.)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Chem. 245
(Quantitative
Analysis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Chem. 221-223
or 321-323 (Organic Chem.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Chem. 436/437/439
(Biochemistry
sequence)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Chem. 455.456
or 451/452
(Physical
Chemistry)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Chem. 475
(Inorganic
Chemistry)
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Chem.
500
(Special
Topics in Chemistry)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Chem. 545
(Instrumental Analysis)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Chem. 590
(Chem.
Seminar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Research
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
sequence of applications in the curriculum fosters an evolving sophistication
with computer use. As an example, students in general chemistry are expected
to prepare laboratory reports with a word processor, and are introduced
to scientific graphing using Kaleidagraph. However, sophisticated features
such as subscript/superscript, equation building, and pasting graphs into
reports are not required. In the subsequent physical chemistry courses
students learn to prepare professional reports, incorporating graphs and
diagrams in the document, and properly formatting formulas and equations.These
skills are further reinforced when preparing a written paper for the Chemistry
Seminar class, Special Topics courses, and undergraduate research.
Likewise molecular modeling with PCSpartan Pro is also used progressively throughout the curriculum. In organic chemistry students build, set up calculations and view molecules in order to better understand organic structure and reactivity. In physical chemistry they use vibrational analysis to complement an experiment in spectroscopy, and in inorganic chemistry they must build and calculate a structure for ferrocene, to demonstrate an understanding of coordination chemistry. A special topics course in computational chemistry builds on these earlier experiences by providing additional theory, as well as an opportunity for students to execute and present a small research project using PCSpartan Pro.
Students
performing undergraduate research rely heavily on the computing faculties
in conducting their projects and reporting the results. This includes using
computing in the research (i.e. analyzing experimental data, conducting
literature searches, performing computer modeling studies), and in preparing
required final reports, as well presentations or posters at campus and
professional conferences. For a representative list of recent departmental
student presentations, see Appendix 1.
A
unique feature of our campus is the large number of transfer students entering
our program. For example, 26% of student enrolled in physical chemistry
in 2003-04 had completed some or all of their lower division coursework
elsewhere. Continuing students often assist transfer students in learnng
to use the software applications. The "paired student" set up of our instructional
sessions is particularly helpful in building this peer teaching environment.
Chemistry 304, Chemistry in the Classroom,
is an introductory chemistry course taken by up to 500 future K-8 teachers
each year. This course was revised in 1999 to include Internet support
and activities. We developed the Chemistry
304 Home Page to provide resources, to both the multiple course instructors,
as well as the students/future teachers enrolled in the course.
[9]. Three new laboratory activities were developed that introduced
course enrollees to chemistry resources on the Internet, while reinforcing
course content.
[10] These activities would not have been possible without access to
the chemistry computer laboratory.
In accordance with the Chemistry Department Assessment Plan,5 we evaluate computer competence in the second quarter physical chemistry laboratory course. Students are expected to modify simple BASIC programs, use quantum mechanics software, employ spreadsheets, perform non-linear curve fitting of experimental data, and submit laboratory reports in a timely manner. As this laboratory relies heavily on computer use, it is expected that students who pass the laboratory portion of the course with a C or better have met the assessment criteria. In the four assessment cycles completed, all students have met this criterion.
Finally, we distribute surveys to graduating seniors in an effort to improve our program. Prior to opening the computer lab, a significant number of respondents cited inadequate computing facilities and instruction as a weakness of the program. Since that time, no respondent has mentioned computing in the chemistry curriculum as an area for improvement.
Acknowledgements
Financial support was provided by the NSF (
NSF-ILI Award #9851333) and the College
of Natural Sciences at CSUSB. Much appreciation is extended to members
of the computer committee, other department faculty, student lab assistants,
and college staff in making our program a reality. Special thanks go to
John Craig for facilitating the laboratory remodel.
Copyright © 2004 by Kimberley R.
Cousins, all rights reserved.
Appendix I: Representative Recent Undergraduate Research Presentations
in Chemistry:
1.McConnell,
Dwain (Cousins, K.R.) "Green Chemistry: Synthesis of Sesamol Allyl Eth
er,
the First Step in the Synthesis of Carpanone", CSUSB McNair Scholar"s
Symposium, August 5, 2004.
2.Rice,
A. (Cousins, K. R), "Preliminary QSAR Analysis of Novel Cooling Compounds,"
CSUSB Undergraduate Research Symposium First Place
, March 2003; also presented at CSU-Wide Research Competition, CSU Chico,
May 2003
3.Bell,
J. M. (Cousins, K. R.) "Semi-Empirical PM-3 Analysis of a and b D-Aldohexoses
in Equilibrium" Biennial Meeting of the CCC of the CSU, San Bernarndino,
July 9, 2001.
4.Reiter,
O. Cousins, K. R. "Using Phase Transfer Catalysis in the First Step of
the Synthesis of Carpanone", National Meeting of the American Chemical
Society, San Diego, CA, April 2, 2001.
5.Bell,
J. M. (Cousins, K. R.) "Qualitative Analysis of Nicotinamide", SC-ACS
Student Affiliate's Research Conference, April 2000; CSUSB and CSU Research
Competitions, 2000.
6.Ramirez,
J. (Cousins, K. R.) Mowrey, B. "Using 2-D C-H NMR Spectroscopy to Completely
Assign the Spectra of Intermediates in the Synthesis of Carpanone," CSUSB
Research Competition, April 1998, and CSU System-Wide Undergraduate Research
Competition, May, 1998.
7.RaeAnne
E. Falvo, Van T. Nguyen, D. Michele Smith, Larry M. Mink, Robert K. Boggess,
Heather Washburn. "Synthesis of Pt(IV)-Tetraphenylporphyrins Via Direct
Oxidative Addition". Inorganic Section, ACS National Conference, San Francisco,
CA, 8. April 1997.
8.D.
Michele Smith, Van T. Nguyen, RaeAnne E. Falvo, Larry M. Mink, Robert K.
Boggess, Heather Washburn, Dennis I. Grove. "Synthesis and Electrochemistry
of [PtIV(para-X)4TPP]Br2 Complexes". Inorganic
Section, ACS National Conference, Las Vegas, NV, (Attachment #113), September
1997.
9.John
W. Voce, "Synthesis and Investigation of Platinum Tetraphenylporphyrins"
at the Twelfth Annual CSU Student Research Competition , Chico, CA, April
1998
10.Laura
Saucedo, "Microscale Synthesis and 1H NMR of Zn(II) and Ni(II)
Para- substituted Tetraphenylporphyrins" at the American Chemical Society
National Conference, Orlando, FL, April 2002.
11."The
Synthesis and Biological Activity of Avocadofurans." Joshua Hoergerand
D. F. Maynard, CUSUB Undergraduate Research Competition: March 10,1997
First Place
12."A
New Group of Insecticidal Compounds from Idioblast Cells of Avocados" Rodriguez,
C. S.; Millar, J. G.; Maynard, D. F.; Trumble, J. T., ESA Annual Meeting,
Nashville, Tennessee, December 14-18, 1997.
13."The
Synthesis of Even-Chained Avocadofurans" Scott Phillips andD.
F. Maynard, 216th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, August
23-27, 1998, Boston, MA.
14."The
Use of Experimental Archaeology in Reconstructing Aztec Super Glue", Ed
Stark, (David F. Maynard and Frances Berdan) 34th ACS Western
Regional Meeting,San Francisco, CA, October 28, 1998.
15.The
Analysis of Ancient Aztec Pottery Sherds" Carolyn Cardellio (Drs. Frances
Berdan and David Maynard), Cal Poly Pomona, November 21, 1998
16."Studies
on the Deprotection of Silyl Ethers: Inhibiting a Cyclization Reactions"
Corrie Kuniyoshi, (Dr. David Maynard), SCCUR Cal Poly Pomona, November
15, 1999
17.Coope,
S. "Effects of alpha and beta-hydroxylallenyl phospine oxide on the growth
of human breast carcinoma cells" 221st National ACS Meeting,
San Diego, CA April 2, 2001
18.Wood
O"Jon, R. " Synthesis and biological activity of alpha-hydroxyallenes,,
221st National ACS Meeting, San Diego, CA April 2, 2001
19.Nadal,
Laura, F. Berdan, D. F. Maynard, "An exceptional sample of feathers: Identification
of the manufacturing techniques." 5th Congress of Ethnobiology,
Chapingo, Mexico, Nov 15, 2003
20.Mr.
Juan Castro delivered a Poster Presentation at the McNair Scholar's Program
National Conference at Penn State University on August 13, 1998.Castro,
Juan; Smith, Douglas. "Approaches to the Synthesis of Dihydrofurans and
Tetrahydrofurans."
21."Modeling
Peak Profile Asymmetry of Basic Compounds in Reversed-Phase High Performance
Liquid Chromatography", J.R. Krance and B.J. Stanley, 221 st
National Meeting of the American ChemicalSociety,
San Diego, CA, April 2, 2001.
22.."Determination
of the Thermodynamic Contribution to Peak Asymmetry of Basic Solutes in
Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography", A. Roy and B.J. Stanley, 14th
Annual Student Research Competition, California State Polytechnic University,
Pomona, CA, May 5, 2000.
23."Determination
of the Thermodynamic Contribution to Peak Asymmetry of Basic Solutes in
Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography", A. Roy and B.J. Stanley, 1999/2000
Student Research Competition, California State University, San Bernardino,
CA, March 1, 2000.
24."Prediction
of Chromatography Peak Tailing Using Isotherms", J.J. Geraghty and B.J.
Stanley, 8th Annual CSUSB Student Research Conference, California State
University, San Bernardino, CA, June 5, 1998.
25."Prediction
of Chromatography Peak Tailing from Isotherms", J.J. Geraghty and B.J.
Stanley, 8th Annual New Directions Undergraduate Research Conference, University
of California, Riverside, CA, May 16, 1998.
26."Prediction
of Chromatography Peak Tailing from Isotherms", J.J. Geraghty and B.J.
Stanley, 12th Annual CSU Student Research Competition, California State
University, Chico, CA, May 2, 1998.
27."Prediction
of Chromatography Peak Tailing from Isotherms", J.J. Geraghty and B.J.
Stanley, 1997-98 Student Research Competition, California State University,
San Bernardino, CA, March 11, 1998.
28."Chromatogram
Peak Prediction in C18 Reversed-Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography",
J.J. Geraghty and B.J. Stanley, Southern California Conference on Undergraduate
Research, California State University, Los Angeles, CA, November 22, 1997.
29.Maryam
Rejali,Ali Reza Rejali (Yang), "
The Cellular Mechanism of Nicotine-Induced Coronary Artery Disease"227th
American Chemical Society National Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 2004.
30.Maryam
Rejali (Yang), first place
at the 11th California State University San Bernardino (CSUSB)
Research Conference, and first place in the 18th Annual CSUSB Student Research
Competition.
31.Ali
Reza Rejali (Yang), first place
at the 14th Annual CSUSB Student Research Conference.
32.Christi
Bonar, Jamie Estrella (Yang), "Effect
of Glucocorticoid on Coronary Artery Endothelial Function", 221st American
Chemical Society National Meeting, San Diego CA, 2001.
33.Kestrel
Rogers, (Yang) "MgATP induced-
conformational change of the c-subunit of cyclic-AMP dependent protein
kinase",2002 Southern California
Undergraduate Research Conference in Chemistry and Biochemistry. California
State University,April 13, 2002 .
34.Joe
Hernandez (Yang) "Cigarette
Smoking and Coronary Heart Disease",
at the National McNair Scholar Conference at University of
New York, Buffalo (2003)